Continuing our epic series on the US Founding Fathers, this time we talk about George Washington and Alexander Hamilton, two good friends who had very different views about religion and politics. Also, a few skunk dicks.
16 Responses to “2.43 Founding Fathers 2”
Yay!!! A new episode!!!!!
(took you long enough 😉 )
Irreligiosophy is sweetened by the tears of listeners.
Sweetened? Are you sure you don’t mean salted?
Anyway, I have no way to tell if you’re joking or not when you talk about listeners not liking bible study/founding fathers stuff, but they’re my favorite episodes.
You may think Washington didn’t summon a priest when he died, but… where you there?
Here are some more sweet, sweet tears of joy…
i couldn’t care less about the founding fathers’ opinion as it is an idiotic argument used to validate political positions. it’s like arguing black face was ok because people used to like it (plus i’m not american) but you have managed to still make two interesting episodes about it you couple of bollocks.
Bible study and Founding Fathers are all candy to me.
Why do you hate America?
me for thinking that those that use the beliefs of the founding fathers (a strange mythologising in itself but all nations do it to some degree) as a way to back up their ideas are fallacious in their logic or chuck for denying those good christian historic figures their beliefs in a magic sky person?
People generally, I think.
On a related note, is Kent Hovind (I almost left in the autocorrect of Kent “Bovine” suggested by my phone) free?
I’ve heard that he is. I suggested that they have him on the show. Maybe they could review the book he wrote while in jail. It looks MUCH better than his dissertation, unfortunately it’s the same old crap.
No, the one true podcast is salted by the cum of listeners.
Hey, you guys sound like you got your mojo back, in terms of productivity. I am hoping against hope that with the resident Hovindologist in the house, you will welcome him back in the most irreligiously way possible.
Anders –
Yes I was there. You weren’t there, and therefore can’t prove I wasn’t.
Q. E. D.
Why has Matt never used the phrase “Be innocent of the knowledge, dearest chuck,
Till thou applaud the deed.”